Anna Li

18 papers receiving 374 citations

Peers

Anna Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Biological Psychiatry 28
  • Parasitology 78
  • Biotechnology 67
  • Infectious Diseases 71
  • Molecular Biology 150
Replace Jane Lima dos Santos with:
Jane Lima dos Santos Brazil
Mena Abdel‐Nour Canada
Jamie C. Newton United States
Diego Carlos dos Reis Brazil
Emma L. James United Kingdom
José Luis Muñoz‐Carrillo Mexico
Srikanth Elesela United States
Jessica L. Forbester United Kingdom
Abdolfattah Sarrafnejad Iran
J. Rick Turner United States
Anna Li relative to Jane Lima dos Santos Brazil Jane Lima dos Santos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.4×
Jane Lima dos Santos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Li. The network helps show where Anna Li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Li Line = papers co-authored together Anna Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201268
2 200157
3 201040
4 201236
5 200426
6
Purification and characterization of two thermostable proteases from the thermophilic fungus Chaetomium thermophilum.
200722
7 202018
8 200717
9 201116
10 202116
11 201114
12 202114
13 200714
14 20169
15 20198
16 20167
17 20253
18 20252
19
What is your diagnosis? Linear Darier disease.
20100

About Anna Li

Anna Li is a scholar working on Immunology, Molecular Biology, Biotechnology, Plant Science and Infectious Diseases, having authored 19 papers that have together received 387 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Enzyme Production and Characterization (4 papers), Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics (2 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (2 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (2 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (2 papers), Phytase and its Applications (2 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (2 papers) and Endometriosis Research and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (28 citations), Parasitology (78 citations), Biotechnology (67 citations), Infectious Diseases (71 citations) and Molecular Biology (150 citations). Anna Li has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Duochuan Li, Judith L. Isaac‐Renton, Jeffrey W. Priest, Yanjie Peng, Silviu‐Alin Bacanu, Zhongming Zhao, Xiujuan Wang, Matthew Helm, Corinne Ong and Delynn M. Moss. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Gene Medicine, The Journal of Immunology, Molecular Therapy, Stem Cell Research & Therapy and World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact