Anna Lavis
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Papers in
-
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors 4
- Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies 3
- Pharmacy 7
- Obesity and Health Practices 7
- Co-authors
- Rachel Winter (4 shared papers)Max Birchwood (9 shared papers)Max Marshall (5 shared papers)David Fowler (6 shared papers)Tim Amos (5 shared papers)Swaran P. Singh (5 shared papers)Vimal Sharma (5 shared papers)Peter B. Jones (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- BMJ Open (5 papers)Early Intervention in Psychiatry (4 papers)Culture Medicine and Psychiatry (2 papers)Social Science & Medicine (2 papers)Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIndiaSouth Sudan
In The Last Decade
Anna Lavis
42 papers receiving 599 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Applied Psychology 56
- Clinical Psychology 222
- Psychiatry and Mental health 138
- Pharmacy 20
- Philosophy 44
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Lavis
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Lavis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Lavis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Lavis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Lavis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Lavis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Lavis. The network helps show where Anna Lavis may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Lavis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 92 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 64 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 56 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 53 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 39 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 27 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 23 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 9 |
About Anna Lavis
Anna Lavis is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pharmacy, General Health Professions, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 46 papers that have together received 620 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity and Health Practices (7 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (4 papers), Diversity and Impact of Dance (4 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (3 papers), Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (3 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (3 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (56 citations), Clinical Psychology (222 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (138 citations), Pharmacy (20 citations) and Philosophy (44 citations). Anna Lavis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and South Sudan. Frequent co-authors include Rachel Winter, Max Birchwood, Max Marshall, David Fowler, Tim Amos, Swaran P. Singh, Vimal Sharma, Peter B. Jones, Helen Lester and Nick Freemantle. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Early Intervention in Psychiatry, Culture Medicine and Psychiatry, Social Science & Medicine and Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.