Anna Lavis
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Papers in
- Pharmacy 7
- Obesity and Health Practices 7
-
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors 4
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Rachel Winter (4 shared papers)Max J. Birchwood (9 shared papers)Max J. Marshall (5 shared papers)Peter Brian Jones (5 shared papers)Tim Amos (5 shared papers)Vimal Kumar Sharma (5 shared papers)David G. Fowler (6 shared papers)Swaran Preet Singh (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- BMJ Open (6 papers)Early Intervention in Psychiatry (4 papers)Culture Medicine and Psychiatry (3 papers)Social Science & Medicine (2 papers)The British Journal of Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIndiaSerbia
In The Last Decade
Anna Lavis
47 papers receiving 697 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Applied Psychology 60
- Clinical Psychology 242
- Psychiatry and Mental health 154
- Pharmacy 25
- Philosophy 49
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Lavis
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Lavis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Lavis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Lavis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Lavis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Lavis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Lavis. The network helps show where Anna Lavis may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Lavis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 109 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 74 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 64 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 53 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 39 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 33 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 32 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 28 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 23 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 17 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 15 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 12 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 10 |
About Anna Lavis
Anna Lavis is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Applied Psychology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 738 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity and Health Practices (7 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (4 papers), Diversity and Impact of Dance (4 papers), Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (3 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (3 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (3 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (60 citations), Clinical Psychology (242 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (154 citations), Pharmacy (25 citations) and Philosophy (49 citations). Anna Lavis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and Serbia. Frequent co-authors include Rachel Winter, Max J. Birchwood, Max J. Marshall, Peter Brian Jones, Tim Amos, Vimal Kumar Sharma, David G. Fowler, Swaran Preet Singh, Helen Lester and Nick Freemantle. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Early Intervention in Psychiatry, Culture Medicine and Psychiatry, Social Science & Medicine and The British Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.