Anna Jameson
Impact in
-
- Library Science and Administration
-
- Social Media and Politics
Papers in
-
- Historical Art and Culture Studies 3
- Fashion and Cultural Textiles 1
- Journals
- Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (1 paper)Cambridge University Press eBooks (7 papers)Medical Entomology and Zoology (1 paper)Journal of the American Society for Information Science (1 paper)Journal of Management in Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- New Zealand
In The Last Decade
Anna Jameson
9 papers receiving 103 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Library and Information Sciences 14
- Communication 27
- Health 9
- Applied Psychology 5
- General Decision Sciences 2
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Jameson
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Jameson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Jameson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Jameson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Jameson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Jameson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Jameson. The network helps show where Anna Jameson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Anna Jameson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 87 | |
| 2 | 1999 | 10 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 4 | |
| 4 | 1998 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 8 | The History of Our Lord As Exemplified in Works of Art: With That of His Types; St. John the Baptist; and Other Persons of the Old and New Testament | 1976 | 2 |
| 9 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 0 | |
| 12 | Legends of the Madonna, As Represented in the Fine Arts | 2006 | 0 |
| 13 | The history of our Lord as exemplified in works of art | 2010 | 0 |
| 14 | Shakespeare's Heroines; Characteristics of Women, Moral, Poetical, and Historical | 2010 | 0 |
About Anna Jameson
Anna Jameson is a scholar working on Museology, Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, History and General Health Professions, having authored 14 papers that have together received 115 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Art and Culture Studies (3 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Byzantine Studies and History (1 paper), Polar Research and Ecology (1 paper), Global Health Workforce Issues (1 paper), Fashion and Cultural Textiles (1 paper) and Research in Social Sciences (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (14 citations), Communication (27 citations), Health (9 citations), Applied Psychology (5 citations) and General Decision Sciences (2 citations). Anna Jameson has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Frank Sligo and Margie Comrie. Their work appears in journals such as Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, Cambridge University Press eBooks, Medical Entomology and Zoology, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Journal of Management in Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.