Anna Hume

19 papers receiving 361 citations

Peers

Anna Hume
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Molecular Medicine 63
  • Clinical Biochemistry 61
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 18
  • Family Practice 18
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 23
Replace Stephen Osmon with:
Stephen Osmon United States
Bin Du China
Ismail Mitha United Kingdom
Marina Esposito‐Farèse France
Qijian Cheng China
Brent W. Gunderson United States
Maria Sole Vallecoccia Italy
Gary Milkovich United States
Miguel Sánchez Spain
Michaël Thy France
Anna Hume relative to Stephen Osmon United States Stephen Osmon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Stephen Osmon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Hume

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Hume's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Hume with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Hume more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Hume

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Hume. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Hume. The network helps show where Anna Hume may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Hume, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Hume Line = papers co-authored together Anna Hume links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200891
2 202247
3 202142
4
Prevalence of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and dyslipidemic hypertension.
199432
5
Family history and premature coronary heart disease.
199729
6 200726
7 201926
8 201724
9 201118
10 20198
11 19958
12 19986
13 20194
14 20203
15 19933
16
Rewards and advancements for clinical pharmacy practitioners
19952
17 20241
18
The individual patient profile.
19841
19
Oral contraceptives in the immediate postpartum period.
19911
20 20180

About Anna Hume

Anna Hume is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases, Surgery and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 20 papers that have together received 372 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (3 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (2 papers), Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (1 paper), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper) and Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (63 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (61 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (18 citations), Family Practice (18 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (23 citations). Anna Hume has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Charles B. Eaton, Kate L. Lapane, Martin A. Weinstock, Patrick N. A. Harris, Susanna Magee, Anna Maria Peri, Adam Irwin, Adam G. Stewart, Amy V. Jennison and Haakon Bergh. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, Clinical Infectious Diseases, BMJ Quality & Safety, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute and Current Infectious Disease Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact