Anna Garber
Impact in
- Equine top 1%
- Veterinary Equine Medical Research
- Animal Science and Zoology top 5%
- Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Meat and Animal Product Quality
- Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
Papers in
- Equine 8
- Veterinary Equine Medical Research 8
-
- Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology 10
- Co-authors
- Jo‐Anne Murray (11 shared papers)Peter Mark Hastie (10 shared papers)Saheed A. Salami (1 shared paper)Neil Ross McEwan (1 shared paper)Françoise Wemelsfelder (1 shared paper)David H. McGuinness (2 shared papers)Ousama AlZahal (2 shared papers)J. France (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Equine Veterinary Science (2 papers)Animals (2 papers)animal (2 papers)Livestock Science (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaSpain
In The Last Decade
Anna Garber
13 papers receiving 292 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Equine 132
- Animal Science and Zoology 104
- Agronomy and Crop Science 45
- Molecular Biology 112
- Aquatic Science 7
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Garber
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Garber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Garber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Garber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Garber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Garber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Garber. The network helps show where Anna Garber may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Anna Garber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 116 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 83 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 44 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 10 | Yeast Increases in vitro Gas Production of High Fibre Substrate When Incubated With an Equine Faecal Inoculum | 2017 | 2 |
| 11 | Yeast Supplementation May Have a Positive Effect on Faecal Microbiome in Ponies Fed High Starch and High Fibre Diets | 2018 | 2 |
| 12 | Effect of Alfalfa on in vitro Fermentation of Starch or Inulin | 2016 | 1 |
| 13 | 2019 | 1 |
About Anna Garber
Anna Garber is a scholar working on Equine, Agronomy and Crop Science, Animal Science and Zoology, Nutrition and Dietetics and Molecular Biology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 295 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (10 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (8 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (4 papers), Gut microbiota and health (3 papers), Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (1 paper), Meat and Animal Product Quality (1 paper) and Food composition and properties (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (132 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (104 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (45 citations), Molecular Biology (112 citations) and Aquatic Science (7 citations). Anna Garber has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Jo‐Anne Murray, Peter Mark Hastie, Saheed A. Salami, Neil Ross McEwan, Françoise Wemelsfelder, David H. McGuinness, Ousama AlZahal, J. France, Secundino López and Mewa Singh Dhanoa. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Equine Veterinary Science, Animals, animal, Livestock Science and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.