Anna Everett

928 citations
25 papers · 406 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Everett

23 papers receiving 237 citations

Peers

Anna Everett
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Communication 56
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 61
  • Gender Studies 53
  • Museology 23
  • Music 16
Replace Jonathan Bignell with:
Jonathan Bignell United Kingdom
Sangita Shresthova United States
Anne Friedberg United States
Paul Grainge United Kingdom
Ellen E. Seiter United States
Eric Michaels Australia
Dagmar Hoffmann Germany
Matthew P. McAllister United States
Jeffrey Sconce United States
Jay P. Telotte United States
Anna Everett relative to Jonathan Bignell United Kingdom Jonathan Bignell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Jonathan Bignell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Everett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Everett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Everett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Everett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Everett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Everett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Everett. The network helps show where Anna Everett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Anna Everett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Everett Line = papers co-authored together Anna Everett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200972
2 200352
3 200244
4 200238
5 200337
6
Learning Race and Ethnicity : Youth and Digital Media
200728
7 200425
8 200424
9 200014
10 200313
11 200311
12
Global Currents: Media and Technology Now
20048
13 20158
14 20087
15 20046
16 20145
17 20094
18 20032
19
Tulip Theory: New Media: Theories and Practices of Digitextuality
20032
20 20031

About Anna Everett

Anna Everett is a scholar working on Communication, Computer Networks and Communications, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Philosophy and Gender Studies, having authored 25 papers that have together received 406 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media and Digital Communication (8 papers), Cultural Studies and Postmodernism (6 papers), Cinema History and Criticism (5 papers), Cultural Identity and Representation (4 papers), Social Media and Politics (4 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (3 papers), Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts (3 papers) and Digital Games and Media (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (56 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (61 citations), Gender Studies (53 citations), Museology (23 citations) and Music (16 citations). Anna Everett has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas R. Cripps, Patrice Petro, Jeffrey Sconce, John Caldwell, Tasha Oren and Toby Miller. Their work appears in journals such as Cinema Journal, Journal of Visual Culture, Social Text, Signs and Journal of American History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact