Anna Copley

27 papers receiving 293 citations

Peers

Anna Copley
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Occupational Therapy 46
  • Epidemiology 130
  • Clinical Psychology 74
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 67
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 50
Replace Rocío Norman with:
Rocío Norman United States
Peter Meulenbroek United States
Diane Powers Dirette United States
Jemma Skeat Australia
Jennifer P. Lundine United States
Asnat Bar-Haim Erez Israel
Sheila MacDonald Canada
Yafit Gilboa Israel
Mark Barisa United States
Amy C. Georgeadis United States
Anna Copley relative to Rocío Norman United States Rocío Norman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Rocío Norman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Copley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Copley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Copley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Copley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Copley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Copley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Copley. The network helps show where Anna Copley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Copley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Copley Line = papers co-authored together Anna Copley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201549
2 202035
3 200734
4 201729
5 201627
6 201715
7 201615
8 201514
9 201412
10 20149
11 20209
12 20208
13 20168
14 20237
15 20134
16 20194
17 20184
18 20193
19
Speech Pathology clinical practice in sub-acute brain injury rehabilitation
20143
20 20213

About Anna Copley

Anna Copley is a scholar working on Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Occupational Therapy, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 29 papers that have together received 306 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traumatic Brain Injury Research (18 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (6 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (5 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (4 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (4 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (3 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (3 papers) and Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (46 citations), Epidemiology (130 citations), Clinical Psychology (74 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (67 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (50 citations). Anna Copley has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Emma Finch, Petrea Cornwell, Crystal Kelly, Louise Hayes, Jan Matthews, Deborah E. Welsh, Jennifer Fleming, Anna Miles, Emmah Doig and Rachel Wenke. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, Speech Language and Hearing, Disability and Rehabilitation, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact