New German Critique

1.1k papers and 10.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in New German Critique in the last decades have received a total of 10.3k indexed citations. Papers published in New German Critique usually cover Sociology and Political Science (448 papers), Political Science and International Relations (257 papers) and History (194 papers) specifically the topics of European history and politics (174 papers), German History and Society (154 papers) and Critical Theory and Philosophy (124 papers). The most active scholars publishing in New German Critique are Jürgen Habermas, Thomas McCarthy, C. Fred Alford, John Czaplicka, Jan Assmann, Andreas Huyssen, Seyla Benhabib, Hal Foster, Nancy Fraser and Dana Polan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in New German Critique

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in New German Critique. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in New German Critique.

Countries where authors publish in New German Critique

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in New German Critique. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in New German Critique with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New German Critique more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025