Anna Berecka

31 papers receiving 466 citations

Peers

Anna Berecka
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Analytical Chemistry 171
  • Spectroscopy 172
  • Organic Chemistry 167
  • Pharmaceutical Science 31
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 82
Replace Olivera Čudina with:
Olivera Čudina Serbia
Sote Vladimirov Serbia
Bhavesh H. Patel India
Lata Kothapalli India
Małgorzata Dołowy Poland
Asmaa A. El‐Zaher Egypt
S. C. Chaturvedi India
A. Naidu India
Jasmina Brborić Serbia
Purvi Shah India
Anna Berecka relative to Olivera Čudina Serbia Olivera Čudina's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Olivera Čudina · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Berecka

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Berecka's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Berecka with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Berecka more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Berecka

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Berecka. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Berecka. The network helps show where Anna Berecka may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Berecka, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Berecka Line = papers co-authored together Anna Berecka links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201087
2 202150
3 201943
4 201732
5 200428
6 201825
7 201924
8 202022
9 201621
10 200320
11 202114
12 200514
13 202012
14 200611
15 200311
16 20218
17 20137
18 20237
19 20227
20 20207

About Anna Berecka

Anna Berecka is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Analytical Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry and Pharmacology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 494 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (17 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (14 papers), Synthesis and biological activity (7 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (5 papers), Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (5 papers), Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (4 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (3 papers) and Computational Drug Discovery Methods (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Analytical Chemistry (171 citations), Spectroscopy (172 citations), Organic Chemistry (167 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (31 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (82 citations). Anna Berecka has collaborated with scholars based in Poland. Frequent co-authors include Anna Gumieniczek, Hanna Hopkała, Anna Biernasiuk, Anna Malm, Łukasz Komsta, Robert Skibiński, Tomasz Mroczek, Krzysztof Z. Łączkowski, Krzysztof Kamil Wojtanowski and Monika Wujec. Their work appears in journals such as Molecules, Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies, Biomedicines, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis and Journal of AOAC International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact