Anna Abel
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Treatment of Major Depression
Papers in
-
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes 6
-
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications 7
- Psychological Treatments and Assessments 1
- Co-authors
- Willem Kuyken (7 shared papers)Adele M. Hayes (3 shared papers)Katrina M. Turner (3 shared papers)Christopher J. Williams (3 shared papers)Anne Garland (3 shared papers)Nicola Ridgway (3 shared papers)David S. Kessler (3 shared papers)John L. Campbell (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (2 papers)The Lancet (1 paper)The British Journal of Psychiatry (1 paper)Contemporary Clinical Trials (1 paper)Health Technology Assessment (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Anna Abel
8 papers receiving 534 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Applied Psychology 63
- Pharmacology 153
- Clinical Psychology 219
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 139
- Social Psychology 49
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Abel
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Abel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Abel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Abel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Abel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Abel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Abel. The network helps show where Anna Abel may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Anna Abel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 266 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 106 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 57 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 36 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 31 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 29 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 12 |
About Anna Abel
Anna Abel is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Pharmacology, Economics and Econometrics and Nuclear Energy and Engineering, having authored 8 papers that have together received 556 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (6 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (3 papers), Psychological Treatments and Assessments (1 paper) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (63 citations), Pharmacology (153 citations), Clinical Psychology (219 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (139 citations) and Social Psychology (49 citations). Anna Abel has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Willem Kuyken, Adele M. Hayes, Katrina M. Turner, Christopher J. Williams, Anne Garland, Nicola Ridgway, David S. Kessler, John L. Campbell, Glyn Lewis and Sandra P Hollinghurst. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, The Lancet, The British Journal of Psychiatry, Contemporary Clinical Trials and Health Technology Assessment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.