Ann E. Stuart

1.4k citations
40 papers · 1.3k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Ann E. Stuart

39 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Ann E. Stuart
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 919
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 185
  • Pharmacology 123
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 34
  • Molecular Biology 379
Replace Eli Shapiro with:
Eli Shapiro United States
Ferdinand S. Vilim United States
Klaudiusz R. Weiss United States
Wesley T. Frazier United States
Philip E. Lloyd United States
Kayoko Onodera Japan
Nikolai C. Dembrow United States
Y. Pichon France
Arnaldo Lasansky United States
Bertram Peretz United States
Ann E. Stuart relative to Eli Shapiro United States Eli Shapiro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.7×
Eli Shapiro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ann E. Stuart

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ann E. Stuart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann E. Stuart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann E. Stuart more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ann E. Stuart

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann E. Stuart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann E. Stuart. The network helps show where Ann E. Stuart may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ann E. Stuart, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ann E. Stuart Line = papers co-authored together Ann E. Stuart links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1970262
2 1974139
3 199996
4 200770
5 198455
6 200650
7 197247
8 197745
9 198944
10 199144
11 197843
12 199941
13 197740
14 197834
15 198130
16 198527
17 199627
18 198926
19 197921
20 198116

About Ann E. Stuart

Ann E. Stuart is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology and Paleontology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (28 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (16 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (9 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (8 papers), Undergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research (3 papers), Leech Biology and Applications (3 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (3 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (919 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (185 citations), Pharmacology (123 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (34 citations) and Molecular Biology (379 citations). Ann E. Stuart has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Albert James Hudspeth, Joseph C. Callaway, Zach W. Hall, Donata Oertel, Akimichi Kaneko, Ian A. Meinertzhagen, Jolanta A. Borycz, William N. Ross, Jon H. Hayashi and Duane R. Edgington. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physiology, Visual Neuroscience, Journal of Neurophysiology, Journal of Experimental Biology and Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact