Ann E. Geers

10.3k citations
110 papers · 7.4k · h-index 45

Impact in

Papers in

Ann E. Geers

104 papers receiving 6.8k citations

Peers

Ann E. Geers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 3.4k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 5.0k
  • Sensory Systems 1.1k
  • Speech and Hearing 523
  • Occupational Therapy 261
Replace Laurie S. Eisenberg with:
Laurie S. Eisenberg United States
Karen Iler Kirk United States
Björn Lyxell Sweden
Mary Rudner Sweden
Lawrence D. Shriberg United States
Stephen Camarata United States
Ann R. Bradlow United States
Field Rickards Australia
Kirrie J. Ballard Australia
Rebecca E. Eilers United States
Ann E. Geers relative to Laurie S. Eisenberg United States Laurie S. Eisenberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Laurie S. Eisenberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ann E. Geers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ann E. Geers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann E. Geers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann E. Geers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ann E. Geers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann E. Geers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann E. Geers. The network helps show where Ann E. Geers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ann E. Geers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ann E. Geers Line = papers co-authored together Ann E. Geers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 110 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003467
2 2003418
3 2007383
4 2009317
5 2006286
6 2003261
7 2004240
8 2008234
9 2003204
10 2010193
11 2010181
12 2003163
13 2002162
14 2000160
15 2008154
16 2012148
17 2017136
18 2006128
19 2010126
20 2001122

About Ann E. Geers

Ann E. Geers is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sensory Systems, Language and Linguistics and Speech and Hearing, having authored 110 papers that have together received 7.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (74 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (39 papers), Language Development and Disorders (9 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (8 papers), Noise Effects and Management (6 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (6 papers), Subtitles and Audiovisual Media (5 papers) and Phonetics and Phonology Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (3.4k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (5.0k citations), Sensory Systems (1.1k citations), Speech and Hearing (523 citations) and Occupational Therapy (261 citations). Ann E. Geers has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and India. Frequent co-authors include Johanna G. Nicholas, Jean S. Moog, Christine Brenner, Emily A. Tobey, Lisa S. Davidson, Allison L. Sedey, David B. Pisoni, Heather Hayes, Rosalie M. Uchanski and Miranda Cleary. Their work appears in journals such as Ear and Hearing, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, The Volta Review, Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact