Ann D. Liebert

41 papers receiving 885 citations

Peers

Ann D. Liebert
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 570
  • Oral Surgery 70
  • Biological Psychiatry 21
  • Pharmacology 132
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 137
Replace Jorge Luis Lopes Zeredo with:
Jorge Luis Lopes Zeredo Japan
Shaiane Silva Tomazoni Brazil
Maria José Alves Rocha Brazil
Daniela Litscher Austria
Junad Khan United States
Federico Paolini Paoletti Italy
Bukkambudhi Virupakshamurthy Murlimanju India
Yang‐Chyuan Chang Taiwan
Álvaro Sosa Machado Portugal
S Fontaine Canada
Ann D. Liebert relative to Jorge Luis Lopes Zeredo Japan Jorge Luis Lopes Zeredo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.8×
Jorge Luis Lopes Zeredo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ann D. Liebert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ann D. Liebert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann D. Liebert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann D. Liebert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ann D. Liebert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann D. Liebert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann D. Liebert. The network helps show where Ann D. Liebert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ann D. Liebert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ann D. Liebert Line = papers co-authored together Ann D. Liebert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202390
2 202184
3 201972
4 201866
5 202347
6 201747
7 201446
8 201644
9 202144
10 202241
11 202239
12 202127
13 202225
14 202122
15 202118
16 202317
17 202417
18 202216
19 202116
20 202115

About Ann D. Liebert

Ann D. Liebert is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pharmacology, Health Information Management, Dermatology and Physiology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 918 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine (35 papers), Medical and Biological Ozone Research (11 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (6 papers), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (5 papers), Healthcare Regulation (5 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (4 papers), Connexins and lens biology (4 papers) and Migraine and Headache Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (570 citations), Oral Surgery (70 citations), Biological Psychiatry (21 citations), Pharmacology (132 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (137 citations). Ann D. Liebert has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Brian T. Bicknell, Hosen Kiat, Craig Steven McLachlan, Michael R. Hamblin, Geoffrey Kenneth Herkes, Daniel M. Johnstone, John Mitrofanis, E‐Liisa Laakso, Roger David Adams and Thomas Julius Borody. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Molecular Sciences, BMC Neurology, Lasers in Medical Science, Frontiers in Neuroscience and Journal of Clinical Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact