Anita Devos
Impact in
- Human Factors and Ergonomics top 10%
- Education top 5%
- Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Global Education and Multiculturalism
- Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
Papers in
- Education 10
- Higher Education Practises and Engagement 3
- Global Education and Multiculturalism 2
- Adult and Continuing Education Topics 2
- Higher Education Research Studies 2
-
- Gender Diversity and Inequality 4
- Co-authors
- Margaret Somerville (1 shared paper)Terri Seddon (2 shared papers)Lesley Farrell (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Anita Devos
14 papers receiving 283 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Human Factors and Ergonomics 23
- Education 231
- Communication 47
- Gender Studies 40
- Music 11
Countries citing papers authored by Anita Devos
This map shows the geographic impact of Anita Devos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anita Devos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anita Devos more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anita Devos
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anita Devos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anita Devos. The network helps show where Anita Devos may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Anita Devos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 105 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 81 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 31 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 20 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 20 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 18 | |
| 7 | What Constitutes Doctoral Knowledge? Exploring Issues of Power and Subjectivity in Doctoral Examination. | 2012 | 15 |
| 8 | 1996 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 12 | 1998 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 15 | Disturbing work, workspaces and working Lives: three Australian case studies | 2010 | 0 |
| 16 | Shifting the Boundaries : Feminist Practices in Adult Education | 1999 | 0 |
About Anita Devos
Anita Devos is a scholar working on Education, Gender Studies, Public Administration, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 16 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Diversity and Inequality (4 papers), Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (3 papers), Higher Education Practises and Engagement (3 papers), Mentoring and Academic Development (3 papers), Global Educational Policies and Reforms (2 papers), Global Education and Multiculturalism (2 papers), Adult and Continuing Education Topics (2 papers) and Higher Education Research Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human Factors and Ergonomics (23 citations), Education (231 citations), Communication (47 citations), Gender Studies (40 citations) and Music (11 citations). Anita Devos has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Margaret Somerville, Terri Seddon and Lesley Farrell. Their work appears in journals such as Globalisation Societies and Education, Studies in Continuing Education, Studies in Higher Education, International Journal of Inclusive Education and Teaching and Teacher Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.