Angus McInnes

437 citations
19 papers · 281 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

    • Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes 3
    • Scottish History and National Identity 3
    • Historical Economic and Social Studies 10

Angus McInnes

16 papers receiving 170 citations

Peers

Angus McInnes
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • History 85
  • Museology 16
  • Pharmacology 67
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 67
  • Literature and Literary Theory 41
Replace Jonathan Lamb with:
Jonathan Lamb United States
Patricia Rodden. Zimmermann Germany
Susan Guettel Cole United States
Gary B. Miles United States
Andrew R. Holmes United Kingdom
Simon Watson Taylor France
Clare Cavanagh United States
Alison Shell United Kingdom
Emily Robinson United Kingdom
Olivier Christin France
Angus McInnes relative to Jonathan Lamb United States Jonathan Lamb's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×22.3×
Jonathan Lamb · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Angus McInnes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Angus McInnes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Angus McInnes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Angus McInnes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Angus McInnes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Angus McInnes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Angus McInnes. The network helps show where Angus McInnes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Angus McInnes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Angus McInnes Line = papers co-authored together Angus McInnes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 1988104
2 200175
3 199726
4 199620
5 198313
6 19829
7 19968
8
Robert Harley, Puritan politician
19707
9 20055
10 19653
11 19963
12 19932
13 19961
14 19811
15 19961
16 19961
17 20001
18 19691
19 19960

About Angus McInnes

Angus McInnes is a scholar working on History, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Anthropology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 281 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Economic and Social Studies (10 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (3 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (3 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (2 papers), Australian History and Society (2 papers), Medieval and Early Modern Justice (2 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (2 papers) and Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (85 citations), Museology (16 citations), Pharmacology (67 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (67 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (41 citations). Angus McInnes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Stephen McGuire, Alan R. Crossman, David Vincent, Monty Silverdale, Jonathan M. Brotchie, John H. Y. Briggs, CHRISTOPHER J. HARRISON, CHRISTOPHER J. HARRISON, Randall McGowen and John D. Mitchell. Their work appears in journals such as History, Midland History, Technology and Culture, The English Historical Review and Experimental Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact