Jonathan Lamb

610 citations
48 papers · 318 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Lamb

30 papers receiving 183 citations

Peers

Jonathan Lamb
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Literature and Literary Theory 91
  • Museology 25
  • Classics 20
  • Geography, Planning and Development 26
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 20
Replace Mary Floyd‐Wilson with:
Mary Floyd‐Wilson United States
Ira Bruce Nadel Canada
Michel Baridon France
Karl A.E. Enenkel Germany
Dabney Townsend United States
David Gentilcore United Kingdom
Aby Moritz Warburg
Nancy Moore Goslee United States
Dennis Todd United States
A. D. Nuttall United Kingdom
Jonathan Lamb relative to Mary Floyd‐Wilson United States Mary Floyd‐Wilson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×
Mary Floyd‐Wilson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Lamb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Lamb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Lamb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Lamb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Lamb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Lamb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Lamb. The network helps show where Jonathan Lamb may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Lamb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Lamb Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Lamb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201253
2 201132
3 200132
4 201926
5 199326
6 201518
7 200415
8 202314
9 200912
10
Scurvy: The Disease of Discovery
201610
11 20088
12 20078
13
Exploration & exchange : a South Seas anthology, 1680-1900
20007
14 19957
15 19895
16 20115
17 19805
18
The New Zealand Sublime
19904
19 19814
20 20113

About Jonathan Lamb

Jonathan Lamb is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Anthropology, Classics, History and Philosophy of Science and Archeology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 318 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include French Literature and Criticism (3 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (3 papers), Narrative Theory and Analysis (2 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (2 papers), Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research (2 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (2 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (2 papers) and History of Science and Natural History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (91 citations), Museology (25 citations), Classics (20 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (26 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (20 citations). Jonathan Lamb has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Fiona Edith Harrison, James Michael May, Vanessa Agnew, Vanessa Smith, Clare Anderson, David Andrew Armitage, Sujit Sivasundaram and Alison R. Bashford. Their work appears in journals such as Eighteenth-Century Studies, Eighteenth-Century Fiction, Huntington Library Quarterly, ELH and MLN.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact