Angus E. Taylor

1.9k citations
32 papers · 1.0k · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Angus E. Taylor

29 papers receiving 739 citations

Peers

Angus E. Taylor
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Mathematical Physics 384
  • Applied Mathematics 376
  • Theoretical Computer Science 33
  • Algebra and Number Theory 115
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 319
Replace Bernard R. Gelbaum with:
Bernard R. Gelbaum United States
A. M. Bruckner United States
H. G. Eggleston United Kingdom
Konrad Knopp Germany
Casper Goffman United States
G. Baley Price United States
E. J. McShane United States
P. S. Bullen Canada
R. Creighton Buck United States
John L. Kelley United States
Angus E. Taylor relative to Bernard R. Gelbaum United States Bernard R. Gelbaum's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9×
Bernard R. Gelbaum · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Angus E. Taylor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Angus E. Taylor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Angus E. Taylor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Angus E. Taylor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Angus E. Taylor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Angus E. Taylor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Angus E. Taylor. The network helps show where Angus E. Taylor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Angus E. Taylor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Angus E. Taylor Line = papers co-authored together Angus E. Taylor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Introduction to functional analysis, 2nd ed.
1986170
2 1966125
3 1967120
4 1959116
5 195272
6 195170
7 196049
8 196245
9 196043
10 196238
11 195633
12 195223
13 198220
14 195714
15 195111
16 195911
17 198510
18 19559
19 19876
20 19746

About Angus E. Taylor

Angus E. Taylor is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Applied Mathematics, Mathematical Physics, Theoretical Computer Science and Geometry and Topology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Matrix Theory and Algorithms (6 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (5 papers), Algebraic and Geometric Analysis (3 papers), advanced mathematical theories (3 papers), Differential Equations and Boundary Problems (3 papers), Holomorphic and Operator Theory (3 papers), Approximation Theory and Sequence Spaces (2 papers) and Numerical methods in inverse problems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (384 citations), Applied Mathematics (376 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (33 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (115 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (319 citations). Angus E. Taylor has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include David C. Lay, F. Hahn, Ralph E. Edwards, R. A. Rosenbaum and E. D. Rainville. Their work appears in journals such as Pacific Journal of Mathematics, Studia Mathematica, American Mathematical Monthly, Mathematische Annalen and Physics Today.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact