Women a Cultural Review

499 papers and 1.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 499 papers published in Women a Cultural Review in the last decades have received a total of 1.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Women a Cultural Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (139 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (117 papers) and Gender Studies (87 papers) specifically the topics of Gender, Feminism, and Media (50 papers), Irish and British Studies (34 papers) and Cinema and Media Studies (28 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Women a Cultural Review are Iris van der Tuin, Rick Dolphijn, Rebecca Coleman, Lynne Segal, Donna Haraway, Victoria Armstrong, Lola Young, Sandra Harding, Deborah Lynn Steinberg and Claire Colebrook.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Women a Cultural Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Women a Cultural Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Women a Cultural Review.

Countries where authors publish in Women a Cultural Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Women a Cultural Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Women a Cultural Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Women a Cultural Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025