Andrew Reeson

3.1k citations
74 papers · 2.3k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Andrew Reeson

72 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Andrew Reeson
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
  • Insect Science 672
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 466
  • Global and Planetary Change 491
  • Ecological Modeling 85
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 189
Replace Kathy Baylis with:
Kathy Baylis United States
Oscar J. Cacho Australia
Benjamin J. Richardson Australia
Gillian Petrokofsky United Kingdom
Thomas Döring Germany
Paul Teng United States
Calum Brown United Kingdom
William R. Meek United States
Charles Francis United States
Andrew Reeson relative to Kathy Baylis United States Kathy Baylis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Kathy Baylis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Reeson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Reeson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Reeson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Reeson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Reeson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Reeson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Reeson. The network helps show where Andrew Reeson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Reeson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew Reeson Line = papers co-authored together Andrew Reeson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001365
2 1998214
3 2010195
4 1998161
5 200383
6 200880
7 201173
8 201372
9 201872
10 200872
11 201671
12 200465
13 201263
14 201263
15 201258
16 200055
17 201033
18 201232
19 201231
20 201130

About Andrew Reeson

Andrew Reeson is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Management Science and Operations Research, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 74 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic and Environmental Valuation (17 papers), Forest Management and Policy (9 papers), Environmental Conservation and Management (8 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (7 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (7 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (6 papers), Water resources management and optimization (5 papers) and Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (672 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (466 citations), Global and Planetary Change (491 citations), Ecological Modeling (85 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (189 citations). Andrew Reeson has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth Wilson, J. K. Pell, Sheena C. Cotter, Scott Heckbert, Tim Baynes, John Tisdell, Andrew D. Austin, Marta Kasper, Rosemary S. Hails and Dave Goulson. Their work appears in journals such as Ecological Economics, Land Use Policy, Environmental and Resource Economics, Scientific Reports and BioScience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact