Andrew Pilling

27 papers receiving 589 citations

Peers

Andrew Pilling
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Developmental Neuroscience 31
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 104
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 97
  • Cancer Research 68
  • Biological Psychiatry 8
Replace Salete Smaniotto with:
Salete Smaniotto Brazil
Emma Rodrı́guez Mexico
Eileen E. Parks United States
Anastasia Tsingotjidou Greece
J.P. van Dijk Netherlands
Tatsuhito Himeno Japan
James Partin United States
Gladys M. Cahuana Spain
Georgina Harris United States
Andrew Pilling relative to Salete Smaniotto Brazil Salete Smaniotto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Salete Smaniotto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Pilling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Pilling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Pilling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Pilling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Pilling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Pilling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Pilling. The network helps show where Andrew Pilling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Pilling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew Pilling Line = papers co-authored together Andrew Pilling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012120
2 2014115
3 201863
4 201751
5 200529
6 199423
7 200223
8 201620
9 200517
10 200817
11 202015
12 200614
13 200612
14 201611
15 199910
16 19999
17 20009
18 20078
19 19998
20 20038

About Andrew Pilling

Andrew Pilling is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, Genetics, Immunology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 27 papers that have together received 609 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (4 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (3 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (3 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (3 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (2 papers) and Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (31 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (104 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (97 citations), Cancer Research (68 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (8 citations). Andrew Pilling has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Richard Haworth, Markus Heilig, Alexander J. MacRobert, Elnaz Yaghini, Imad Naasani, Jenica D. Tapocik, Estelle Barbier, Jesse R. Schank, Hui Sun and Matthew G. Solomon. Their work appears in journals such as Toxicologic Pathology, International Journal of Experimental Pathology, Veterinary Pathology, Human & Experimental Toxicology and Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact