Andrew P. Sciallis

34 papers receiving 795 citations

Peers

Andrew P. Sciallis
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 123
  • Reproductive Medicine 87
  • Cancer Research 147
  • Oncology 211
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 100
Replace Maki Tanioka with:
Maki Tanioka Japan
T F Lioe United Kingdom
Karen A. Cadoo United States
Tingguo Zhang China
Simona Maria Fragomeni Italy
Federica Torricelli Italy
Dearbhaile Catherine Collins Ireland
Myriam Kossaï France
Holm Eggemann Germany
Vincenzo Sforza Italy
Andrew P. Sciallis relative to Maki Tanioka Japan Maki Tanioka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Maki Tanioka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew P. Sciallis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew P. Sciallis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew P. Sciallis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew P. Sciallis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew P. Sciallis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew P. Sciallis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew P. Sciallis. The network helps show where Andrew P. Sciallis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew P. Sciallis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew P. Sciallis Line = papers co-authored together Andrew P. Sciallis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017325
2 201469
3 201251
4 201532
5 201730
6 201530
7 201630
8 201529
9 202022
10 201421
11 201219
12 202119
13 201717
14 201616
15 201915
16 202114
17 201412
18 20239
19 20137
20 20106

About Andrew P. Sciallis

Andrew P. Sciallis is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Surgery, Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 37 papers that have together received 812 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (10 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (4 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (4 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (3 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (3 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (3 papers) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (123 citations), Reproductive Medicine (87 citations), Cancer Research (147 citations), Oncology (211 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (100 citations). Andrew P. Sciallis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and China. Frequent co-authors include Jacqueline S. Jeruss, Simona Maria Fragomeni, Jennelle C. Hodge, Gary L. Keeney, Debra A. Bell, William R. Sukov, Patrick P. Bedroske, John K. Schoolmeester, Karen McLean and Ashish P. Wasnik. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Clinical Pathology, The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, International Journal of Gynecological Pathology, Diagnostic Cytopathology and Laboratory Investigation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact