Andrew Mitchell

94 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Andrew Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Insect Science 731
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.0k
  • Ecological Modeling 154
  • Genetics 830
  • Horticulture 24
Replace J. L. Nieves‐Aldrey with:
J. L. Nieves‐Aldrey Spain
Diana Pilson United States
Brandon S. Cooper United States
Jennifer A. White United States
Wenjun Bu China
Mark J. Blacket Australia
Dinah Hales Australia
Wanzhi Cai China
Wolfgang Arthofer Austria
Alejandro Zaldívar‐Riverón Mexico
Andrew Mitchell relative to J. L. Nieves‐Aldrey Spain J. L. Nieves‐Aldrey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
J. L. Nieves‐Aldrey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Mitchell. The network helps show where Andrew Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Andrew Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 101 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995280
2 2005133
3 2000125
4 1997112
5 201088
6 200881
7 201277
8 200862
9 200257
10 200955
11 200852
12 201246
13 200843
14 200343
15 201542
16 201339
17 200038
18 200235
19 199735
20 200632

About Andrew Mitchell

Andrew Mitchell is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Insect Science, Molecular Biology and Plant Science, having authored 101 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (25 papers), Plant and animal studies (19 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (17 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (10 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (10 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (8 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (7 papers) and Identification and Quantification in Food (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (731 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.0k citations), Ecological Modeling (154 citations), Genetics (830 citations) and Horticulture (24 citations). Andrew Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Charles Mitter, Jerome C. Regier, Robert W. Poole, Timothy P. Friedlander, Peter B. Heenan, David Gopurenko, M. Matthews, Yoseph Assefa, Corinne S. Abraham and Steven J. Wagstaff. Their work appears in journals such as Zootaxa, Records of the Australian Museum, Systematic Entomology, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution and Austral Entomology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact