Mark J. Blacket

2.9k citations
75 papers · 2.1k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Mark J. Blacket

70 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Mark J. Blacket
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Ecological Modeling 228
  • Insect Science 533
  • Ecology 923
  • Genetics 754
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 549
Replace Daniel R. Matute with:
Daniel R. Matute United States
Juan Galindo Spain
Noah K. Whiteman United States
Scott P. Egan United States
Marianne Élias France
Leonie C. Moyle United States
Marie‐Pierre Chapuis France
Pablo Orozco‐terWengel United Kingdom
Camilo Salazar Colombia
Heike Hadrys Germany
Mark J. Blacket relative to Daniel R. Matute United States Daniel R. Matute's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Daniel R. Matute · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark J. Blacket

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark J. Blacket's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark J. Blacket with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark J. Blacket more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark J. Blacket

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark J. Blacket. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark J. Blacket. The network helps show where Mark J. Blacket may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark J. Blacket, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark J. Blacket Line = papers co-authored together Mark J. Blacket links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012313
2 2019168
3 201097
4 200693
5 201676
6 200776
7 200874
8 201766
9 201262
10 199759
11 200656
12 201050
13 199944
14 200743
15 202141
16 201039
17 200938
18 201737
19 201036
20 202032

About Mark J. Blacket

Mark J. Blacket is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Molecular Biology and Genetics, having authored 75 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect behavior and control techniques (16 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (13 papers), Plant and animal studies (12 papers), Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (11 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (10 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (9 papers), Evolution and Paleontology Studies (8 papers) and Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (228 citations), Insect Science (533 citations), Ecology (923 citations), Genetics (754 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (549 citations). Mark J. Blacket has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jana Batovska, Ary A. Hoffmann, Siu Fai Lee, Robert T. Good, Charles Robin, Adam D. Miller, Carey Krajewski, Michael Westerman, Brendan Rodoni and Alexander M. Piper. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Molecular Ecology, Zootaxa, PLoS ONE and Molecular Ecology Resources.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact