Andrew Meadows
Impact in
- Anthropology top 2%
- Classical Antiquity Studies
- Historical and Literary Studies
- Archeology top 2%
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
- Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
- Archaeology and Historical Studies
- Ancient Near East History
Papers in
- Anthropology 16
- Classical Antiquity Studies 16
- Archeology 14
- Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History 10
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 4
- Archaeology and Historical Studies 4
- Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies 2
- Ancient Near East History 2
Andrew Meadows
18 papers receiving 134 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Anthropology 226
- Archeology 172
- Classics 45
- History 44
- Space and Planetary Science 4
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Meadows
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Meadows's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Meadows with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Meadows more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Meadows
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Meadows. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Meadows. The network helps show where Andrew Meadows may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Meadows, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 92 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 64 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 48 | |
| 4 | Fouilles d'Amyzon 6 reconsidered: the Ptolemies at Amyzon | 2008 | 14 |
| 5 | 2001 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 8 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 11 | Some Greek coins in the British Museum | 1998 | 2 |
| 12 | Athenian coin dies from Egypt: the new discovery at Herakleion | 2011 | 2 |
| 13 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 15 | Archaeological Excavations at Kinik Höyük, nigde (Campaign 2016). The 5th-1st Century BCE Levels, and the End of the Occupation of the Citadel | 2017 | 1 |
| 16 | 2005 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 20 | Numismatics and Linked Open Data | 2021 | 1 |
About Andrew Meadows
Andrew Meadows is a scholar working on Anthropology, Archeology, Classics, Conservation and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 24 papers that have together received 281 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (16 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (10 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (4 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (4 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (3 papers), Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies (2 papers), Conservation Techniques and Studies (2 papers) and Ancient Near East History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (226 citations), Archeology (172 citations), Classics (45 citations), History (44 citations) and Space and Planetary Science (4 citations). Andrew Meadows has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan Williams and Karsten Tolle. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Roman Studies, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, The Classical Quarterly, The Journal of Hellenic Studies and Revue numismatique.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.