Andrew MacFarlane

70 papers receiving 726 citations

Peers

Andrew MacFarlane
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Library and Information Sciences 87
  • Information Systems 394
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 61
  • Communication 88
  • Human-Computer Interaction 42
Replace Mimi M. Recker with:
Mimi M. Recker United States
Christopher Lueg Australia
Sanjay Kairam United States
Ayşe Göker United Kingdom
Heinrich Schwarz United States
Barbara H. Kwaśnik United States
Dana McKay Australia
Mats Daniels Sweden
Damiano Spina Australia
Robert J. Sandusky United States
Andrew MacFarlane relative to Mimi M. Recker United States Mimi M. Recker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.9×
Mimi M. Recker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew MacFarlane

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew MacFarlane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew MacFarlane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew MacFarlane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew MacFarlane

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew MacFarlane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew MacFarlane. The network helps show where Andrew MacFarlane may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew MacFarlane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew MacFarlane Line = papers co-authored together Andrew MacFarlane links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202263
2 202262
3 200758
4 201941
5 200238
6 201234
7 202033
8 200932
9 200630
10 202028
11 201027
12 200623
13 200721
14 201520
15 200819
16 200615
17 201715
18 201614
19 201913
20
Information behaviour of music record collectors
201412

About Andrew MacFarlane

Andrew MacFarlane is a scholar working on Information Systems, Library and Information Sciences, Human Factors and Ergonomics, Human-Computer Interaction and Communication, having authored 71 papers that have together received 788 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (43 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (13 papers), Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (5 papers), Journalism and Media Studies (5 papers), Music and Audio Processing (4 papers), Media Studies and Communication (4 papers), Information Science and Libraries (3 papers) and Web and Library Services (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (87 citations), Information Systems (394 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (61 citations), Communication (88 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (42 citations). Andrew MacFarlane has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen E. Robertson, Tony Russell‐Rose, Gerd Berget, David G. Mountain, Stephann Makri, Wei Ping Lu, Farhad Shokraneh, Colin Porlezza, Glenda Cooper and Julie A. McCann. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Documentation, Aslib Journal of Information Management, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Information Processing & Management and Information Retrieval.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact