Andrew Howes

3.4k citations
121 papers · 2.2k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Andrew Howes

111 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Andrew Howes
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Human-Computer Interaction 514
  • General Decision Sciences 160
  • Information Systems and Management 339
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 489
  • Social Psychology 364
Replace Wai‐Tat Fu with:
Wai‐Tat Fu United States
Angelika Dimoka United States
Ellen Isaacs United States
Katharina Reinecke United States
Helene Hembrooke United States
Ellen R. Tauber United States
Chirag Shah United States
John B. Black United States
Matthew L. Jensen United States
Jolene Galegher United States
Andrew Howes relative to Wai‐Tat Fu United States Wai‐Tat Fu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Wai‐Tat Fu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Howes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Howes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Howes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Howes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Howes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Howes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Howes. The network helps show where Andrew Howes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Howes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew Howes Line = papers co-authored together Andrew Howes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 121 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009138
2 2009128
3 2014125
4 200091
5 201969
6 200962
7 199659
8 198655
9 202253
10 200851
11 199050
12 199745
13 199045
14 201142
15 201640
16 201339
17 201738
18 201936
19 200135
20 199434

About Andrew Howes

Andrew Howes is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Human-Computer Interaction, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 121 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (16 papers), AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (14 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (14 papers), Cognitive Science and Mapping (13 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (13 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (11 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (11 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (514 citations), General Decision Sciences (160 citations), Information Systems and Management (339 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (489 citations) and Social Psychology (364 citations). Andrew Howes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Richard L. Lewis, Duncan P. Brumby, Stephen J. Payne, Alonso Vera, Richard M. Young, Jens Binder, Alistair Sutcliffe, Satinder Singh, Antti Oulasvirta and Dario D. Salvucci. Their work appears in journals such as Cognitive Science, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Topics in Cognitive Science, Human-Computer Interaction and Polyhedron.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact