Andrew C. Smith

2.3k citations
82 papers · 1.4k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

    • Spinal Cord Injury Research 26
    • Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 5
    • Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation 4
    • Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 4

Andrew C. Smith

80 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Andrew C. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Otorhinolaryngology 124
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 426
  • Oral Surgery 158
  • Rehabilitation 83
  • Neurology 106
Replace Steven J. Scrivani with:
Steven J. Scrivani United States
Alai̇tti̇n Elhan Türkiye
Noshir R. Mehta United States
E‐Liisa Laakso Australia
Mary J. Hawkshaw United States
Francesco Arcuri Italy
Mathias Haefeli Switzerland
Anne Keller Norway
Maria Nilner Sweden
Cem Bilgen Türkiye
Andrew C. Smith relative to Steven J. Scrivani United States Steven J. Scrivani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×27.7×
Steven J. Scrivani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew C. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew C. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew C. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew C. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew C. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew C. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew C. Smith. The network helps show where Andrew C. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew C. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew C. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Andrew C. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006218
2 199783
3 201482
4 201665
5 201159
6 199653
7 200552
8 201950
9 201835
10 201834
11 202031
12 202130
13 201728
14 201528
15 201427
16 202027
17 201126
18 201025
19 201425
20 202022

About Andrew C. Smith

Andrew C. Smith is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Neurology and Pharmacology, having authored 82 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (26 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (7 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (6 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (5 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (5 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (4 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers) and Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (124 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (426 citations), Oral Surgery (158 citations), Rehabilitation (83 citations) and Neurology (106 citations). Andrew C. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Arun Chandu, S.N. Rogers, Maria Knikou, James M. Elliott, Kenneth A. Weber, Todd B. Parrish, Chaithanya K. Mummidisetty, Marie Wasielewski, Mark A. Hoggarth and Rebecca Abbott. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Spinal Cord, PLoS ONE and Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact