Andrew Box
Impact in
- Aging top 2%
- Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
- Paleontology top 5%
- Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Papers in
-
- Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics 11
- RNA Research and Splicing 9
- Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation 4
- Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics 4
- Congenital heart defects research 3
- Pluripotent Stem Cells Research 2
-
- Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies 3
- Co-authors
- Craig L. Semerad (6 shared papers)Jeffrey S. Haug (6 shared papers)Jay R. Unruh (6 shared papers)Allison Peak (4 shared papers)Xi He (2 shared papers)Linheng Li (2 shared papers)Toshio Suda (1 shared paper)Ningyi Xu (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- eLife (4 papers)Journal of Biomolecular Techniques JBT (3 papers)PLoS Genetics (2 papers)Nature (2 papers)Cell (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Andrew Box
35 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Aging 109
- Paleontology 138
- Molecular Biology 985
- Cell Biology 213
- Hematology 101
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Box
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Box's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Box with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Box more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Box
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Box. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Box. The network helps show where Andrew Box may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Box, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 225 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 182 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 169 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 132 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 98 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 90 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 81 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 76 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 61 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 57 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 54 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 49 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 45 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 43 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 36 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 32 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 21 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 13 |
About Andrew Box
Andrew Box is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering, Biophysics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (11 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (9 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (4 papers), Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (4 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (4 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (3 papers), Congenital heart defects research (3 papers) and Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (109 citations), Paleontology (138 citations), Molecular Biology (985 citations), Cell Biology (213 citations) and Hematology (101 citations). Andrew Box has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Craig L. Semerad, Jeffrey S. Haug, Jay R. Unruh, Allison Peak, Xi He, Linheng Li, Toshio Suda, Ningyi Xu, Xiao-bo Zhong and Fumio Arai. Their work appears in journals such as eLife, Journal of Biomolecular Techniques JBT, PLoS Genetics, Nature and Cell.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.