Sarah E. Smith
Impact in
- Cell Biology top 5%
- Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
- Cellular transport and secretion
- Aging top 10%
Papers in
-
- Nuclear Structure and Function 6
- Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics 6
- RNA Research and Splicing 5
- Cell Biology 11
- Microtubule and mitosis dynamics 6
- Co-authors
- Brian D. Slaughter (10 shared papers)Jay R. Unruh (13 shared papers)J. M. Tisdall (1 shared paper)Pichu Rengasamy (1 shared paper)Rong Li (1 shared paper)Sue L. Jaspersen (8 shared papers)Rong Li (3 shared papers)Joel Schwartz (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Scientific Reports (4 papers)Blood (4 papers)The Journal of Cell Biology (3 papers)eLife (3 papers)PLoS ONE (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Sarah E. Smith
66 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
- Cell Biology 365
- Aging 28
- Molecular Biology 835
- Genetics 107
- Soil Science 88
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah E. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah E. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah E. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah E. Smith. The network helps show where Sarah E. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah E. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 149 | |
| 2 | 1997 | 144 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 125 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 120 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 111 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 109 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 71 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 65 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 60 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 58 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 55 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 51 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 49 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 48 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 45 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 39 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 38 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 36 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 32 | |
| 20 | 2008 | 31 |
About Sarah E. Smith
Sarah E. Smith is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases and Surgery, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hormonal and reproductive studies (7 papers), Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment (6 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (6 papers), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (6 papers), Nuclear Structure and Function (6 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (6 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (6 papers) and RNA Research and Splicing (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (365 citations), Aging (28 citations), Molecular Biology (835 citations), Genetics (107 citations) and Soil Science (88 citations). Sarah E. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Brian D. Slaughter, Jay R. Unruh, J. M. Tisdall, Pichu Rengasamy, Rong Li, Sue L. Jaspersen, Rong Li, Joel Schwartz, Dániel Kirilly and Changjiang Weng. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Blood, The Journal of Cell Biology, eLife and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.