Andreas Pich

161 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers

Andreas Pich
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Immunology 516
  • Molecular Biology 1.6k
  • Infectious Diseases 387
  • Cell Biology 310
  • Cancer Research 208
Replace Bernd Schröder with:
Bernd Schröder Germany
Penelope J. Duerksen-Hughes United States
Thomas L. Dawson United States
Christoph Rahner United States
Giorgio Arrigoni Italy
Kai Stühler Germany
Luca Musante Italy
Mariola J. Edelmann United States
Erwin Knecht Spain
Katarzyna Kwiatkowska Poland
Andreas Pich relative to Bernd Schröder Germany Bernd Schröder's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Bernd Schröder · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andreas Pich

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andreas Pich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andreas Pich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andreas Pich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andreas Pich

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andreas Pich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andreas Pich. The network helps show where Andreas Pich may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andreas Pich, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andreas Pich Line = papers co-authored together Andreas Pich links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 169 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015170
2 2016143
3 2011131
4 201187
5 200377
6 200670
7 201064
8 201760
9 201059
10 201157
11 199957
12 201354
13 199954
14 201153
15 202252
16 201252
17 201151
18 201451
19 200150
20 201549

About Andreas Pich

Andreas Pich is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Immunology, Infectious Diseases, Cell Biology and Spectroscopy, having authored 169 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (16 papers), Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins (15 papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (12 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (10 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (9 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (8 papers) and Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Immunology (516 citations), Molecular Biology (1.6k citations), Infectious Diseases (387 citations), Cell Biology (310 citations) and Cancer Research (208 citations). Andreas Pich has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jan R. Andreesen, Ingo Just, Ralf Gerhard, Hans‐Peter Braun, Anke Schröder, Hubert Bahl, David Rauh, Kerstin Wydra, Thomas F. Schulz and Bizunesh Abere. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Scientific Reports, PLoS ONE, PROTEOMICS and Journal of Proteome Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact