Andreas Hoecht

1.0k citations
17 papers · 699 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Andreas Hoecht

17 papers receiving 613 citations

Peers

Andreas Hoecht
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Management Information Systems 218
  • Strategy and Management 318
  • Business and International Management 28
  • Information Systems and Management 80
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 68
Replace Robey with:
Robey United States
Hans Solli‐Sæther Norway
Muhamad Jantan Malaysia
Ahmad Ghoneim United Kingdom
Ghiyoung Im United States
Peter Baloh Slovenia
Colin Ashurst United Kingdom
Debra Howcroft United Kingdom
Nina Helander Finland
A.S.A. Du Toit South Africa
Andreas Hoecht relative to Robey United States Robey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Robey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andreas Hoecht

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andreas Hoecht's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andreas Hoecht with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andreas Hoecht more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andreas Hoecht

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andreas Hoecht. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andreas Hoecht. The network helps show where Andreas Hoecht may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Andreas Hoecht, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andreas Hoecht Line = papers co-authored together Andreas Hoecht links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2005172
2 2006149
3 200665
4 201157
5 200846
6 200745
7 200730
8 201428
9 199925
10 200421
11 200718
12 200416
13 200414
14 20117
15 20063
16 20022
17
Trust me, I?m a professional: trust, credentialism and the new professions
20051

About Andreas Hoecht

Andreas Hoecht is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Management Information Systems, Information Systems and Management, Marketing and Business and International Management, having authored 17 papers that have together received 699 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (6 papers), Digital Platforms and Economics (5 papers), Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management (3 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (3 papers), Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (2 papers), Copyright and Intellectual Property (2 papers), Intellectual Property and Patents (2 papers) and Business Strategy and Innovation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (218 citations), Strategy and Management (318 citations), Business and International Management (28 citations), Information Systems and Management (80 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (68 citations). Andreas Hoecht has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul Trott, Semra Özdemir, Sena Ozdemir, Steve Williams and Sarah Gilmore. Their work appears in journals such as Technovation, International Journal of Innovation Management, Higher Education, Journal of Managerial Psychology and Technology Analysis and Strategic Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact