Ana Novais

437 citations
23 papers · 350 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Ana Novais

21 papers receiving 328 citations

Peers

Ana Novais
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Global and Planetary Change 283
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 44
  • Forestry 8
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 23
Replace Maria João Canadas with:
Maria João Canadas Portugal
Juan José Fallas Monge New Zealand
Steven J. Taff United States
Johanna Lundström Sweden
Grant K. Hauer Canada
Ida Wallin Sweden
Claudio Forner Indonesia
Kees Hendriks Netherlands
Markus Lier Finland
Margret Köthke Germany
Ana Novais relative to Maria João Canadas Portugal Maria João Canadas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Maria João Canadas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ana Novais

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ana Novais's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ana Novais with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ana Novais more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ana Novais

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ana Novais. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ana Novais. The network helps show where Ana Novais may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Ana Novais, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ana Novais Line = papers co-authored together Ana Novais links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200952
2 201650
3 202230
4 202028
5 202127
6 201426
7 202323
8 202118
9 202017
10 202016
11 202115
12 201813
13 202211
14 20217
15 20216
16 20234
17 20212
18 20211
19 20241
20 20231

About Ana Novais

Ana Novais is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Mechanics of Materials and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 23 papers that have together received 350 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (14 papers), Forest Management and Policy (14 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (9 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (4 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (4 papers), Rural development and sustainability (3 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers) and Flood Risk Assessment and Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (283 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (32 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (44 citations), Forestry (8 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (23 citations). Ana Novais has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Italy and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Maria João Canadas, José Lima Santos, Paulo Flores Ribeiro, FRANCISCO EDVANDO DE AQUINO MOREIRA, Ângela Lomba, Miguel Leal, Sandra Oliveira, José Luı́s Zêzere, Filipa Coutinho Soares and Luísa Schmidt. Their work appears in journals such as Land Use Policy, Forest Policy and Economics, Forests, Small-scale Forestry and Fire.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact