Ana Hategan

45 papers receiving 205 citations

Peers

Ana Hategan
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Applied Psychology 11
  • General Health Professions 48
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 26
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 8
  • Biological Psychiatry 4
Replace Shannon Halloway with:
Shannon Halloway United States
Helena Hörder Sweden
Annika Lena Neuhaus Germany
Knut Eirik Dalene Norway
Ingunn Bosnes Norway
Carlene Britt Australia
Heather Cuevas United States
Maryam Selk-Ghaffari Iran
Joanna McGregor United Kingdom
Kerry S. Whittaker United States
Ana Hategan relative to Shannon Halloway United States Shannon Halloway's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Shannon Halloway · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ana Hategan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ana Hategan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ana Hategan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ana Hategan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ana Hategan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ana Hategan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ana Hategan. The network helps show where Ana Hategan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Ana Hategan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ana Hategan Line = papers co-authored together Ana Hategan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201419
2 201518
3 202016
4 201913
5 201312
6 20169
7 20149
8 20229
9 20209
10 20158
11 20208
12 20236
13 20135
14 20145
15 20185
16 20124
17 20244
18 20084
19 20194
20
Borderline personality disorder in older adults: Emphasis on care in institutional settings
20154

About Ana Hategan

Ana Hategan is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry and Mental health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 61 papers that have together received 214 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (8 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (6 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (5 papers), Elder Abuse and Neglect (5 papers), Climate Change and Health Impacts (4 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (4 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (4 papers) and Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (11 citations), General Health Professions (48 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (26 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (8 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (4 citations). Ana Hategan has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include James A. Bourgeois, Amin Azzam, Glen L. Xiong, Calvin H. Hirsch, Sheila Harms, Heather Waters, Bruno J. Losier, Julie Young, Verónica Sánchez and Mariwan Husni. Their work appears in journals such as Psychosomatics, Canadian Geriatrics Journal, General Hospital Psychiatry, Perspectives on Medical Education and Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact