Amy G. Applegate

456 citations
35 papers · 284 · h-index 11

Impact in

  • Health top 5%
    • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Demography top 5%
    • Family Dynamics and Relationships

Papers in

Amy G. Applegate

30 papers receiving 231 citations

Peers

Amy G. Applegate
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Health 151
  • Demography 122
  • Clinical Psychology 89
  • Sociology and Political Science 183
  • Social Psychology 65
Replace Peter Salem with:
Peter Salem United States
Rae Kaspiew Australia
Joan S. Meier United States
Vivienne Roseby United States
Margreet Visser Netherlands
Mildred Daley Pagelow United States
Ana Isabel Sani Portugal
Dawn K. Cecil United States
Echo A. Rivera United States
Charles E. Stokes United States
Amy G. Applegate relative to Peter Salem United States Peter Salem's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Peter Salem · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amy G. Applegate

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy G. Applegate's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy G. Applegate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy G. Applegate more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy G. Applegate

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy G. Applegate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy G. Applegate. The network helps show where Amy G. Applegate may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Amy G. Applegate, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amy G. Applegate Line = papers co-authored together Amy G. Applegate links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201045
2 201136
3 201320
4 201418
5 201118
6 201514
7 201213
8 201512
9 202012
10 201510
11 201010
12 20159
13 20109
14 20137
15 20177
16 20195
17 20204
18 20154
19 20164
20 20094

About Amy G. Applegate

Amy G. Applegate is a scholar working on Health, Sociology and Political Science, Demography, Clinical Psychology and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 35 papers that have together received 284 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intimate Partner and Family Violence (18 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (14 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (7 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (5 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (4 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (4 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (3 papers) and Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (151 citations), Demography (122 citations), Clinical Psychology (89 citations), Sociology and Political Science (183 citations) and Social Psychology (65 citations). Amy G. Applegate has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Amy Holtzworth‐Munroe, Connie J. A. Beck, Brian M. D’Onofrio, Brittany N. Rudd, John E. Bates, John Bates, Lily J. Jiang, Michele E. Walsh, Mary C Murphy and Steven J. Sherman. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology Public Policy and Law, Journal of Family Psychology, Assessment, Family Court Review and Conflict Resolution Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact