Amy Chieng

12 papers receiving 255 citations

Amy Chieng's Hit Papers

A Therapeutic Relational Agent for Reducing Problematic Substance Use (Woebot): Development and Usability Study 2021 · 139 citations
1390+1+3Years since publication4080120

Peers

Amy Chieng
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Applied Psychology 166
  • Health Informatics 20
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 84
  • General Health Professions 66
  • Social Psychology 44
Replace Ines Hungerbuehler with:
Ines Hungerbuehler Brazil
Margaret R. Emerson United States
Tanya L. Feng Canada
Natali Rauseo-Ricupero United States
Madhura Kadaba United Kingdom
Silvia Rizzi Italy
Andreas Balaskas Ireland
Yusuf Sherwani United Kingdom
Sarim Siddiqui United Kingdom
Julia R Pozuelo United Kingdom
Amy Chieng relative to Ines Hungerbuehler Brazil Ines Hungerbuehler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Ines Hungerbuehler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amy Chieng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy Chieng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy Chieng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy Chieng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy Chieng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy Chieng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy Chieng. The network helps show where Amy Chieng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Amy Chieng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amy Chieng Line = papers co-authored together Amy Chieng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1
A Therapeutic Relational Agent for Reducing Problematic Substance Use (Woebot): Development and Usability Study
Hit paper breakdown →
2021139
2 202152
3 201625
4 201618
5 20237
6 20235
7 20224
8 20204
9 20214
10 20203
11 20242
12 20241
13 20240
14 20250

About Amy Chieng

Amy Chieng is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Physiology, General Health Professions, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Health, having authored 14 papers that have together received 264 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (6 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (5 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (2 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (2 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (166 citations), Health Informatics (20 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (84 citations), General Health Professions (66 citations) and Social Psychology (44 citations). Amy Chieng has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Argentina. Frequent co-authors include Judith J. Prochaska, Michael Baiocchi, Athena Robinson, Erin A. Vogel, Sarah Pajarito, Matthew S. Kendra, Dale Dagar Maglalang, Kenneth R. Weingardt, Alison Darcy and Eric J. Daza. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, JMIR mhealth and uhealth, Contemporary Clinical Trials and American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact