Ami Harbin

21 papers receiving 207 citations

Peers

Ami Harbin
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Social Psychology 87
  • Reproductive Medicine 26
  • Gender Studies 27
  • Philosophy 25
  • Sociology and Political Science 86
Replace Stephen Cranney with:
Stephen Cranney United States
Ela Przybyło United States
Donald Moss United States
Anna Mollow United States
Carla Golden United States
Rachel Kraus United States
Andrea C. Westlund United States
Virginia L. Blum United States
Anna I. Corwin United States
Lauren Fournier United States
Ami Harbin relative to Stephen Cranney United States Stephen Cranney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Stephen Cranney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ami Harbin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ami Harbin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ami Harbin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ami Harbin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ami Harbin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ami Harbin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ami Harbin. The network helps show where Ami Harbin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Ami Harbin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ami Harbin Line = papers co-authored together Ami Harbin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201248
2 201645
3 201127
4 201222
5 201718
6 202215
7 201613
8 20148
9 20134
10 20203
11 20233
12 20143
13 20192
14 20152
15 20202
16 20222
17 20232
18 20172
19 20181
20 20111

About Ami Harbin

Ami Harbin is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 22 papers that have together received 224 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emotions and Moral Behavior (4 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (3 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Free Will and Agency (2 papers) and Reproductive Health and Technologies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (87 citations), Reproductive Medicine (26 citations), Gender Studies (27 citations), Philosophy (25 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (86 citations). Ami Harbin has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Lisa Goldberg, Brenda L. Beagan, Sue Campbell, Sharon Howell, Christine M. Koggel, Jennifer Llewellyn, Kelly J. Baker, Mark C. Navin and Naomi Laventhal. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, Hypatia, Health Care For Women International, Journal of Global Ethics and Bioethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact