Anna I. Corwin

428 citations
16 papers · 213 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Anna I. Corwin

14 papers receiving 196 citations

Peers

Anna I. Corwin
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 41
  • Health 25
  • Gender Studies 26
  • Linguistics and Language 11
  • Human-Computer Interaction 13
Replace Susan M. Behuniak with:
Susan M. Behuniak United States
Eliza Chandler Canada
Susan Fox United States
Joaquim Pires Valentim Portugal
Henry A. Danso Canada
Alice Galper United States
Thomas J. Socha United States
Franziska Meißner Germany
Ileana Enesco Spain
Tia Neha New Zealand
Anna I. Corwin relative to Susan M. Behuniak United States Susan M. Behuniak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Susan M. Behuniak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna I. Corwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna I. Corwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna I. Corwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna I. Corwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna I. Corwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna I. Corwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna I. Corwin. The network helps show where Anna I. Corwin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Anna I. Corwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna I. Corwin Line = papers co-authored together Anna I. Corwin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1
Successful Aging as a Contemporary Obsession: Global Perspectives
201768
2 201723
3 201222
4
Language and Gender Variance: Constructing Gender beyond the Male/female Binary
200918
5 202116
6 202011
7 202011
8 201410
9 201710
10 20209
11 20128
12 20215
13
Growing Old with God: An Alternative Vision of Aging Well
20171
14 20211
15 20210
16
Why Do Nuns Outlive the Rest of Us: Six Tips for Healthy Aging
20130

About Anna I. Corwin

Anna I. Corwin is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Health, having authored 16 papers that have together received 213 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (4 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (3 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (3 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers), Gender Studies in Language (2 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (2 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper) and Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (41 citations), Health (25 citations), Gender Studies (26 citations), Linguistics and Language (11 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (13 citations). Anna I. Corwin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Neal King, Sarah Lamb, Toni Calasanti, Cordelia Erickson‐Davis, Lucía Alcalá, Andrew D. Coppens, Jeremy N. Bailenson, Kara Weisman, T. M. Luhrmann and Lianne M. Kurina. Their work appears in journals such as Hau Journal of Ethnographic Theory, Gender and Language, Frontiers in Psychology, Religion Brain & Behavior and Journal of Linguistic Anthropology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact