Amber Hill

23 papers receiving 489 citations

Peers

Amber Hill
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Health 234
  • General Health Professions 100
  • Gender Studies 41
  • Speech and Hearing 24
  • Clinical Psychology 73
Replace Helen L. Coons with:
Helen L. Coons United States
Juanita J. Chinn United States
Kathryn Andersen Clark United States
Lois A. Haggerty United States
Oya Kavlak Türkiye
Rita Henderson Canada
Mikyung Baek United States
Wanda Phillips-Beck Canada
Olayide Ogunsiji Australia
Mercedes M. Blackstone United States
Amber Hill relative to Helen L. Coons United States Helen L. Coons's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Helen L. Coons · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amber Hill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amber Hill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber Hill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber Hill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amber Hill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber Hill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber Hill. The network helps show where Amber Hill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amber Hill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amber Hill Line = papers co-authored together Amber Hill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016235
2 200776
3 201943
4 201326
5 202018
6 201817
7 201812
8 201910
9 20219
10 20128
11 20237
12 20227
13 20206
14 20206
15 20226
16 20225
17 20214
18 20223
19 20223
20
Community-based approaches to intimate partner violence : a review of evidence and essential steps to adaptation
20162

About Amber Hill

Amber Hill is a scholar working on Health, Gender Studies, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Social Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 506 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intimate Partner and Family Violence (12 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (5 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (3 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (3 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (3 papers), Sex work and related issues (2 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (2 papers) and Elder Abuse and Neglect (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (234 citations), General Health Professions (100 citations), Gender Studies (41 citations), Speech and Hearing (24 citations) and Clinical Psychology (73 citations). Amber Hill has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Bangladesh. Frequent co-authors include Christina Pallitto, Jennifer McCleary‐Sills, Claudı́a Garcia‐Moreno, Elizabeth Penland Miller, Kelley A. Jones, Heather L. McCauley, Jay G. Silverman, Daniel Joseph Tancredi, Galen E. Switzer and Salim Yusuf. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Adolescent Health, Journal of Women s Health, Violence Against Women, Pediatric Diabetes and Journal of Interpersonal Violence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact