Amanda Piper

566 citations
17 papers · 408 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Amanda Piper

17 papers receiving 403 citations

Peers

Amanda Piper
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Oncology 223
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 82
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 42
  • Otorhinolaryngology 9
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 4
Replace Nancy Payeur with:
Nancy Payeur Canada
Rachid Bekkali Morocco
Pip Youl Australia
Brittany M. Bernardo United States
Lise Vilstrup Holm Denmark
Lauren P. Waldman United States
Maggie Crowe United Kingdom
Mhairi F. Simpson United Kingdom
Savitri Singh‐Carlson United States
Nazek Abdelmutti Canada
Amanda Piper relative to Nancy Payeur Canada Nancy Payeur's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.6×
Nancy Payeur · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Piper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Piper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Piper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Piper. The network helps show where Amanda Piper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Piper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda Piper Line = papers co-authored together Amanda Piper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2019151
2 202166
3 202060
4 201920
5 202019
6 201717
7 202214
8
The state of cancer rehabilitation in Australia
20189
9 20179
10 20178
11 20167
12 20227
13 20227
14
A clinical placement program for primary care professionals at a comprehensive cancer centre.
20165
15 20194
16 20233
17 20232

About Amanda Piper

Amanda Piper is a scholar working on Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Sociology and Political Science and Otorhinolaryngology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 408 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (9 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers), Family Support in Illness (3 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (2 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (2 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (1 paper), Cultural Competency in Health Care (1 paper) and Management of metastatic bone disease (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (223 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (82 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (42 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (9 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (4 citations). Amanda Piper has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include Michael Jefford, Karolina Lisy, Jennifer Kent, Craig R. Underhill, Kate Burbury, Leslie Gilham, Peter Brooks, Desmond Yip, Lachlan J. McDowell and Linda Nolte. Their work appears in journals such as Supportive Care in Cancer, Journal of Cancer Survivorship, Acta Oncologica, Journal of Clinical Medicine and International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact