Amanda M. Amacker

455 citations
8 papers · 356 · h-index 8

Impact in

    • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
    • Gender, Security, and Conflict
    • Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Health top 10%
    • Intimate Partner and Family Violence

Papers in

    • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies 5
    • Gender, Security, and Conflict 2
    • Intimate Partner and Family Violence 2

Amanda M. Amacker

8 papers receiving 334 citations

Peers

Amanda M. Amacker
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Gender Studies 147
  • Health 71
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 29
  • Clinical Psychology 70
  • Sociology and Political Science 136
Replace Inge van Nistelrooij with:
Inge van Nistelrooij Netherlands
Irene Bevc Canada
Penny Jameson United States
Kristin E. Silver United States
Jesús Henares Montiel Spain
Jessica K. Perrotte United States
Katie M. Heiden‐Rootes United States
Mario Jacoby United States
John A. Yozwiak United States
Amanda J. Hasselle United States
Amanda M. Amacker relative to Inge van Nistelrooij Netherlands Inge van Nistelrooij's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×
Inge van Nistelrooij · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda M. Amacker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda M. Amacker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda M. Amacker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda M. Amacker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda M. Amacker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda M. Amacker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda M. Amacker. The network helps show where Amanda M. Amacker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Amanda M. Amacker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda M. Amacker Line = papers co-authored together Amanda M. Amacker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2010115
2 201185
3 201053
4 201337
5 200822
6 201316
7 201115
8 201313

About Amanda M. Amacker

Amanda M. Amacker is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Health, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 8 papers that have together received 356 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (5 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (2 papers), Gender, Security, and Conflict (2 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (1 paper), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper) and Child Abuse and Trauma (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (147 citations), Health (71 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (29 citations), Clinical Psychology (70 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (136 citations). Amanda M. Amacker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Audrey K. Miller, Heather Littleton, Christine A. Gidycz, Robert J. Cramer, Amber L. Paukert, Jeremy W. Pettit, Keith D. Markman, Tasha A. Menaker and Matt R. Nobles. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Behavior Therapy, Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, Psychology of Women Quarterly and Sex Roles.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact