Amanda Kost

30 papers receiving 312 citations

Peers

Amanda Kost
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Family Practice 29
  • Emergency Medical Services 45
  • Gender Studies 48
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 99
  • General Health Professions 64
Replace Candace J. Chow with:
Candace J. Chow United States
Tyra Fainstad United States
Kirsty Freeman Singapore
Julie Brice United Kingdom
Mary Seabrook United Kingdom
Eva Pfarrwaller Switzerland
Steven Rougas United States
Allison R. Ownby United States
Miriam Boillat Canada
Joanne P.I. Fokkema Netherlands
Amanda Kost relative to Candace J. Chow United States Candace J. Chow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×22×
Candace J. Chow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Kost

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Kost's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Kost with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Kost more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Kost

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Kost. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Kost. The network helps show where Amanda Kost may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Kost, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda Kost Line = papers co-authored together Amanda Kost links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201478
2 201529
3 201525
4 201922
5 201322
6
Medical Student Participation in Family Medicine Department Extracurricular Experiences and Choosing to Become a Family Physician.
201619
7 201917
8 201914
9 20229
10 20178
11 20198
12 20158
13 20227
14 20177
15 20147
16 20226
17 20195
18 20215
19 20234
20 20174

About Amanda Kost

Amanda Kost is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 32 papers that have together received 324 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diversity and Career in Medicine (7 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (2 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (2 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (1 paper), Hemostasis and retained surgical items (1 paper) and Empathy and Medical Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (29 citations), Emergency Medical Services (45 citations), Gender Studies (48 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (99 citations) and General Health Professions (64 citations). Amanda Kost has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Frederick M. Chen, Jacob Prunuske, David Evans, Sharon A. Dobie, Inginia Genao, Jonathan W. Lee, Christopher P. Morley, Julie Phillips, Thomas H. Greer and John F. McCarthy. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Medicine, Teaching and Learning in Medicine, Family Medicine, Medical Clinics of North America and The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact