Amanda Copeland

1.8k citations
36 papers · 1.2k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Amanda Copeland

36 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Amanda Copeland
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 516
  • Genetics 276
  • Oncology 554
  • Hematology 99
  • Molecular Biology 510
Replace Nagesh Kalakonda with:
Nagesh Kalakonda United Kingdom
Mark Bishton United Kingdom
Beth Christian United States
Jennifer E. Amengual United States
Georgios Z. Rassidakis United States
Laurence Cooke United States
Megan M. O’Meara United States
Herbert Eradat United States
Magdalena Klánová Czechia
James Q. Wang Australia
Amanda Copeland relative to Nagesh Kalakonda United Kingdom Nagesh Kalakonda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Nagesh Kalakonda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Copeland

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Copeland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Copeland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Copeland more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Copeland

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Copeland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Copeland. The network helps show where Amanda Copeland may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Copeland, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda Copeland Line = papers co-authored together Amanda Copeland links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011158
2 2016157
3 2012134
4 2012119
5 201385
6 201782
7 201568
8 200966
9 201156
10 201254
11 201640
12 201029
13 200924
14 201723
15 201117
16 201113
17 200912
18 201012
19 201212
20 201110

About Amanda Copeland

Amanda Copeland is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Molecular Biology, Oncology, Genetics and Neurology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (20 papers), Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research (13 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (8 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (7 papers), Protein Degradation and Inhibitors (5 papers), CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (2 papers) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (516 citations), Genetics (276 citations), Oncology (554 citations), Hematology (99 citations) and Molecular Biology (510 citations). Amanda Copeland has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Anas Younes, Sattva S. Neelapu, Michelle A. Fanale, Yasuhiro Oki, Jorge Romaguera, Larry W. Kwak, Luis Fayad, Daniela Buglio, Frederick Hagemeister and Peter McLaughlin. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Clinical Cancer Research, The Lancet Oncology and Current Opinion in Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact