A.M. Bento
Impact in
-
- Forensic and Genetic Research
- Genetic diversity and population structure
- Race, Genetics, and Society
- Archeology top 5%
- Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Papers in
- Genetics 27
- Forensic and Genetic Research 26
- Genetic diversity and population structure 4
- Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research 2
-
- Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications 17
- Identification and Quantification in Food 3
- dental development and anomalies 3
- Co-authors
- M.J. Anjos (20 shared papers)M. Carvalho (18 shared papers)L.H.C. Andrade (14 shared papers)Pricila da Silva Cunha (10 shared papers)Duarte Nuno Vieira (4 shared papers)Cláudio Oliveira (5 shared papers)M.C. Vide (2 shared papers)Leonor Gusmão (2 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
A.M. Bento
29 papers receiving 130 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Genetics 116
- Archeology 38
- Molecular Biology 67
- Paleontology 6
- Ecology 21
Countries citing papers authored by A.M. Bento
This map shows the geographic impact of A.M. Bento's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A.M. Bento with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A.M. Bento more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by A.M. Bento
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A.M. Bento. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A.M. Bento. The network helps show where A.M. Bento may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside A.M. Bento, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 20 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 18 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 10 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 10 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2014 | 2 |
About A.M. Bento
A.M. Bento is a scholar working on Genetics, Molecular Biology, Ecology, Archeology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 32 papers that have together received 139 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic and Genetic Research (26 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (17 papers), Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (6 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (5 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (4 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (3 papers), dental development and anomalies (3 papers) and Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (116 citations), Archeology (38 citations), Molecular Biology (67 citations), Paleontology (6 citations) and Ecology (21 citations). A.M. Bento has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Spain and Germany. Frequent co-authors include M.J. Anjos, M. Carvalho, L.H.C. Andrade, Pricila da Silva Cunha, Duarte Nuno Vieira, Cláudio Oliveira, M.C. Vide, Leonor Gusmão, Ana Luísa Teixeira and Mónica Sousa. Their work appears in journals such as Forensic science international. Genetics supplement series, Forensic Science International Genetics, Crime & Delinquency, Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine and Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.