Allison Smith

659 citations
36 papers · 462 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Allison Smith

32 papers receiving 454 citations

Peers

Allison Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 214
  • Clinical Psychology 94
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 52
  • Pharmacology 59
  • Pharmacy 13
Replace Judith A. Flohr with:
Judith A. Flohr United States
Jesús Díaz United States
Marcella May United States
Audrey E. Nelson United States
Janne Kulmala Finland
Sarah Morley United Kingdom
Maria Piedade Brandão Portugal
Laurinda B. Harman United States
Edgar Heim Switzerland
Elise A. M. Knoppert-van der Klein Netherlands
Allison Smith relative to Judith A. Flohr United States Judith A. Flohr's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Judith A. Flohr · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Allison Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Allison Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Allison Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Allison Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Allison Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Allison Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Allison Smith. The network helps show where Allison Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Allison Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Allison Smith Line = papers co-authored together Allison Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201570
2 201567
3 201937
4 200634
5 201628
6 201428
7 201826
8 200526
9 201426
10 201723
11 201814
12 201312
13 201412
14 201310
15 20207
16 20115
17 20215
18 20234
19 20203
20 20163

About Allison Smith

Allison Smith is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology, Clinical Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 36 papers that have together received 462 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (16 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (7 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (5 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (5 papers), Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies (3 papers), Transportation Planning and Optimization (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers) and Urban Transport and Accessibility (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (214 citations), Clinical Psychology (94 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (52 citations), Pharmacology (59 citations) and Pharmacy (13 citations). Allison Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Laura E. Simons, Deirdre E. Logan, Karen J. Kaczynski, Christine B. Sieberg, Edin T. Randall, Paul Florsheim, Ellen Flannery-Schroeder, Joseph Naor, Neil L. Schechter and Nicole Immorlica. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Journal of Pain, Pain, American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Journal of Pain and Journal of Psychosomatic Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact