Allison E. Britt

521 citations
6 papers · 319 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Allison E. Britt

6 papers receiving 311 citations

Peers

Allison E. Britt
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 230
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 153
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 86
  • Language and Linguistics 42
  • Social Psychology 59
Replace Analía Barbón with:
Analía Barbón Spain
Svetlana Malyutina Russia
Angela Ku-Yuan Tzeng United States
Xiaoqian Li Singapore
Christina Manouilidou Greece
Korinna Eckstein Germany
Shin-Yi Fang United States
Eugenia Kulakova Germany
Andreas Mädebach Germany
Teodora H. Mehotcheva Hungary
Allison E. Britt relative to Analía Barbón Spain Analía Barbón's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Analía Barbón · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Allison E. Britt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Allison E. Britt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Allison E. Britt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Allison E. Britt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Allison E. Britt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Allison E. Britt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Allison E. Britt. The network helps show where Allison E. Britt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Allison E. Britt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Allison E. Britt Line = papers co-authored together Allison E. Britt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 2017138
2 2013101
3 201650
4 201324
5 20135
6
Biomedical Corpus Filtering: A Weak Supervision Paradigm With Infused Domain Expertise.
20211

About Allison E. Britt

Allison E. Britt is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Molecular Biology and Social Psychology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 319 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (5 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (4 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (1 paper), Natural Language Processing Techniques (1 paper), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (1 paper), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (1 paper) and Topic Modeling (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (230 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (153 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (86 citations), Language and Linguistics (42 citations) and Social Psychology (59 citations). Allison E. Britt has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Mirman, Qi Chen, James S. Magnuson, Sergey A. Kornilov, Ioana Baldini and Catherine Del Vecchio Fitz. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Psychologica, Psychological Bulletin, Frontiers in Psychology, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Neuropsychologia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact