Alison Harper

525 citations
39 papers · 295 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Alison Harper

37 papers receiving 291 citations

Peers

Alison Harper
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Emergency Medical Services 89
  • Management Science and Operations Research 95
  • Management Information Systems 50
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 53
  • Health Information Management 19
Replace Joe Viana with:
Joe Viana Norway
Kirandeep Chahal United Kingdom
Siebren Groothuis Netherlands
Wineke A.M. van Lent Netherlands
Seung Chul Kim United States
Evrim Didem Güneş Türkiye
Masoud Fakhimi United Kingdom
Giuseppe Converso Italy
Waleed Abo-Hamad Ireland
Julie Eatock United Kingdom
Alison Harper relative to Joe Viana Norway Joe Viana's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Joe Viana · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alison Harper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alison Harper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alison Harper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alison Harper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alison Harper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alison Harper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alison Harper. The network helps show where Alison Harper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alison Harper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alison Harper Line = papers co-authored together Alison Harper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202052
2 202050
3 202024
4 201921
5 202215
6 201813
7 202311
8 201710
9 20239
10 20228
11 20197
12 20246
13 20236
14 20235
15 20235
16 20225
17 20235
18 20225
19
Blunders will never cease
20015
20 20224

About Alison Harper

Alison Harper is a scholar working on Emergency Medical Services, Management Science and Operations Research, Management Information Systems, Economics and Econometrics and Emergency Medicine, having authored 39 papers that have together received 295 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization (18 papers), Simulation Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (8 papers), Business Process Modeling and Analysis (6 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (6 papers), Digital Transformation in Industry (3 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (3 papers) and Scientific Computing and Data Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medical Services (89 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (95 citations), Management Information Systems (50 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (53 citations) and Health Information Management (19 citations). Alison Harper has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Norway and United States. Frequent co-authors include Navonil Mustafee, Thomas Monks, Mike Yearworth, Andreas Tolk, Bhakti Stephan Onggo, Martin Pitt, J. H. Powell, Joe Viana, Mark Feeney and Masoud Fakhimi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Operational Research Society, Journal of Simulation, BMJ Open, European Journal of Operational Research and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact