Agness Tembo

18 papers receiving 330 citations

Peers

Agness Tembo
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 182
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 152
  • Research and Theory 12
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 61
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 34
Replace S. McKinley with:
S. McKinley Australia
Nadiye Özer Türkiye
Gülay Altun Uğraş Türkiye
Antoine Bioy France
Katarzyna Kwiecień-Jaguś Poland
Saskia Boeke Netherlands
Yeşim Yaman Aktaş Türkiye
James M. Badger United States
Marita Ritmala‐Castrén Finland
Gill Sörensen Duppils Sweden
Agness Tembo relative to S. McKinley Australia S. McKinley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.3×
S. McKinley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Agness Tembo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Agness Tembo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Agness Tembo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Agness Tembo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Agness Tembo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Agness Tembo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Agness Tembo. The network helps show where Agness Tembo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Agness Tembo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Agness Tembo Line = papers co-authored together Agness Tembo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200997
2 201364
3 201456
4 201343
5 201822
6 201713
7 20209
8 20169
9 20129
10 20236
11 20185
12 20244
13 20173
14
Honest and faked responses on the Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons Scale--Form A.
19942
15 20221
16 20131
17 20181
18 20151
19 20250
20 20250

About Agness Tembo

Agness Tembo is a scholar working on Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and General Health Professions, having authored 23 papers that have together received 346 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (11 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (10 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (4 papers), Nursing education and management (3 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (2 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (2 papers) and Empathy and Medical Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (182 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (152 citations), Research and Theory (12 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (61 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (34 citations). Agness Tembo has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, South Africa and United States. Frequent co-authors include Vicki Parker, Isabel Higgins, Janice Gullick, Michelle Giles, Gabor Major, Linda Ross, Kerry Cooper, Fenella J. Gill, Melanie Greenwood and Debbie Massey. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Critical Care, Nursing Philosophy, Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, Journal of Social Work Practice and International Journal of Social Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact