Adele Diederich

107 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

Adele Diederich
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • General Decision Sciences 805
  • Sensory Systems 724
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.5k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.6k
  • Applied Psychology 188
Replace Douglas H. Wedell with:
Douglas H. Wedell United States
Joseph G. Johnson United States
Joachim Vandekerckhove United States
Jacob Lund Orquin Denmark
Peter Juslin Sweden
Matthew J. C. Crump United States
Chris Donkin Australia
Brandon M. Turner United States
Don van den Bergh Netherlands
Alexandra Sarafoglou Netherlands
Adele Diederich relative to Douglas H. Wedell United States Douglas H. Wedell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.8×
Douglas H. Wedell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Adele Diederich

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Adele Diederich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adele Diederich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adele Diederich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Adele Diederich

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adele Diederich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adele Diederich. The network helps show where Adele Diederich may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Adele Diederich, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Adele Diederich Line = papers co-authored together Adele Diederich links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 113 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004303
2 2004199
3 1997189
4 2002185
5 2008155
6 1997117
7 2003110
8 1995108
9 2006106
10 2006101
11 198788
12 200377
13 201875
14 201567
15 200367
16 201760
17 200257
18 200357
19 201050
20 199946

About Adele Diederich

Adele Diederich is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 113 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multisensory perception and integration (41 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (38 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (27 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (25 papers), Color perception and design (20 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (13 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (11 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (805 citations), Sensory Systems (724 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.5k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.6k citations) and Applied Psychology (188 citations). Adele Diederich has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Cambodia. Frequent co-authors include Hans Colonius, Jerome R. Busemeyer, Jennifer S. Trueblood, Thomas S. Wallsten, David V. Budescu, Ido Erev, Norman Wirsik, Stefan Rach, Peter Oswald and Joffre Swait́. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Experimental Brain Research, PLoS ONE, Psychological Review and Cognitive Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact