Peter Oswald

3.1k citations
95 papers · 2.3k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Oswald

90 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Peter Oswald
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Computational Mechanics 1.1k
  • Numerical Analysis 235
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 584
  • Applied Mathematics 243
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 83
Replace Olof Runborg with:
Olof Runborg Sweden
Li‐Tien Cheng United States
Dirk Praetorius Austria
Paul Houston United Kingdom
Peter Binev United States
Per Lötstedt Sweden
Andrew Knyazev United States
Walter Schempp Germany
Maher Moakher Tunisia
J. A. Scott United Kingdom
Peter Oswald relative to Olof Runborg Sweden Olof Runborg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Olof Runborg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Oswald

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Oswald's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Oswald with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Oswald more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Oswald

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Oswald. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Oswald. The network helps show where Peter Oswald may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Oswald, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Oswald Line = papers co-authored together Peter Oswald links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 95 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994187
2 2016182
3 1995174
4 2016138
5 2002135
6 1995109
7 200596
8 200371
9
Albinism: its implications for refractive development.
200070
10 199959
11 199251
12 199351
13 199050
14 201048
15 199340
16 199539
17 200338
18 200336
19 199233
20 199432

About Peter Oswald

Peter Oswald is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mechanics of Materials, Applied Mathematics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 95 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics (28 papers), Numerical methods in engineering (20 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (19 papers), Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques (19 papers), Matrix Theory and Algorithms (13 papers), Optical Network Technologies (8 papers), Image and Signal Denoising Methods (8 papers) and Mathematical Approximation and Integration (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mechanics (1.1k citations), Numerical Analysis (235 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (584 citations), Applied Mathematics (243 citations) and Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (83 citations). Peter Oswald has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Michael Griebel, Amin Shokrollahi, Peer Fischer, Peter Schröder, Andrew G. Mark, Hyeon‐Ho Jeong, Mariana Alarcón‐Correa, Tung‐Chun Lee, Insook Kim and Steven W. Nelson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Approximation Theory, Numerische Mathematik, Mathematics of Computation, Mathematische Nachrichten and Computing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact