Abitha Thomas

898 citations
16 papers · 200 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Abitha Thomas

16 papers receiving 148 citations

Peers

Abitha Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 61
  • Plant Science 141
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 59
  • Insect Science 30
  • Forestry 6
Replace M. Ahmed with:
M. Ahmed New Zealand
Gordon C. Younkin United States
James A. Wearn United Kingdom
Antonieta Nassif Salomão Brazil
Anil Raghavendra Australia
K. Niemi Finland
Natasha Teutsch Hausmann United States
Janet R. Hilton United Kingdom
Brian E. Maust Mexico
Maria Tomaso‐Peterson United States
Abitha Thomas relative to M. Ahmed New Zealand M. Ahmed's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×
M. Ahmed · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Abitha Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Abitha Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Abitha Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Abitha Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Abitha Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Abitha Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Abitha Thomas. The network helps show where Abitha Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Abitha Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Abitha Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Abitha Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 197841
2 197425
3 198521
4 199118
5 197617
6 202113
7 202111
8 199210
9 199510
10 20169
11 19776
12 19975
13 19715
14 20254
15 20213
16 20212

About Abitha Thomas

Abitha Thomas is a scholar working on Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Insect Science, Pharmacology and Molecular Biology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 200 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant tissue culture and regeneration (5 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (3 papers), Biological Control of Invasive Species (3 papers), Allelopathy and phytotoxic interactions (3 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (2 papers), Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (2 papers), Biological and pharmacological studies of plants (2 papers) and CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (61 citations), Plant Science (141 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (59 citations), Insect Science (30 citations) and Forestry (6 citations). Abitha Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in India and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Hugh M. Dale, Kapaettu Satyamoorthy, Doug A. Derksen, Diether P. Peschken, S Padmalatha, R. L. Peterson, Richard J. Reader, L. P. Lefkovitch, Kanive Parashiva Guruprasad and Manjunath Bandu Joshi. Their work appears in journals such as PROTOPLASMA, Biocontrol Science and Technology, GigaScience, Biotechnology Reports and aBIOTECH.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact